🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to remove African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the past when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.