🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies searching for data to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on pirated data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.